Fulvic acid modulates the response of amino acids, phenolic acids, organic acids, and mineral elements in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) under nitrate stress

Introduction

Exogenous substances such as methyl jasmonate, betaine, and fulvic acid (FA), are sprayed in appropriate concentrations to increase the nutrient content of vegetables. FA is the best and most potent humus component; as a plant growth regulator, it promotes crop growth, improves crop quality, facilitates mineral uptake and transportation, and makes plants more salt-tolerant. Because of its relatively small molecular weight and large number of active functional groups, it can easily enter plant cells as a donor of plant polyphenols or as an acceptor of hydrogen, directly affecting plant redox processes. It is showed that FA, when absorbed by the crop, can promote the development of the root system, which promotes the absorption of more nutrients and water by the crop. FA also can promote the absorption and transport of essential nutrients, maintain nutrient balance, and improve the appearance and flavor of tomato fruits under Cu and Cd stress. It has also been shown that FA has a positive effect on the nutritional quality of cabbage. At present, FA has been currently applied to grain crops such as rice, economic crops such as peanuts, and vegetable crops such as tomatoes. However, reports on the application of FA to improve the nutritional quality of vegetable crops under nitrate stress are lacking.

In agricultural production, the response and adaptation mechanisms of different crops to nitrate stress are specific, and relatively few studies have been conducted on spinach, an essential leafy vegetable. In addition, spinach is sensitive to nitrate and is economically essential, and FA has potential advantages but needs to be further investigated for its role under nitrate stress in spinach. Therefore, we investigated the changes in amino acid, phenolic acid, organic acid, and mineral element contents after FA application in spinach under nitrate stress, broadening the understanding of its effects on spinach nutrient content, exploring a new approach to mitigate the damage caused by nitrate stress, and providing theoretical and technological justifications for improving the high-quality cultivation of spinach.

Results

Effect of fulvic acid on spinach biomass under nitrate stress

Nitrate stress significantly reduced the fresh (Fig. 1A) and dry (Fig. 1B) weights of spinach. The total fresh and dry weights of spinach were reduced by 55.78% and 27.62%, respectively, compared with that of the control. FA application significantly alleviated the reduction in spinach biomass owing to stress. FA application increased the total fresh and dry weights of spinach by 43.26% and 17.72%, respectively, compared with those obtained during nitrate stress. This indicates that FA promotes the normal growth of spinach under nitrate stress.

41598 2025 93974 Fig1 HTML
Fig. 1 Effect of FA on spinach biomass under nitrate stress. Data are expressed as an average (n = 3). Mean values of different letters indicate significant differences using Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Control (CK), 0.15% FA (CF), 150 mM NO3 (N), 0.15% FA + 150 mM NO3 (NF). (A) Fresh weight. (B) Dry weight.

Effect of fulvic acid amino acid content in spinach under nitrate stress

FA affected the amino acid content of spinach leaves under nitrate stress (Table 1). Compared with the normal control (CK), the 150 mM NO3 (N) treatment significantly reduced the total amino acid content by 31.34%. Phenylalanine (17.65%), threonine (21.29%), asparagine (31.99%), leucine (31.28%), isoleucine (8.62%), tryptophan (10.76%), valine (50.97%), tyrosine (45.96%), cysteine (12.27%), alanine (38.65%), glutamate (39.63%), glycine (3.00%), serine (30.34%), aspartate (38.95%), histidine (22.10%), and glutamine (8.86%) contents were significantly reduced; proline and arginine contents increased significantly by 13.99% and 32.87%. Compared with the N treatment, the 0.15% FA + 150 mM NO3 (NF) treatment increased the total amino acid content by 11.80%. Threonine (9.44%), asparagine (27.85%), valine (12.35%), tyrosine (12.73%), alanine (6.79%), glutamate (16.84%), serine (9.57%), histidine (18.31%), arginine (51.33%), and glutamine (4.54%) contents were significantly increased; proline was decreased by 7.01%. Compared with the CK, the 0.15% FA (CF) treatment increased the total amino acid content by 5.30%. Asparagine (8.61%), valine (9.71%), proline (20.59%), tyrosine (20.93%), cysteine (13.36%), serine (23.37%), and aspartate (13.35%) contents were significantly increased, whereas tryptophan content was significantly decreased by 4.21%.

Amino acid typeTreatments
CKCFNNF
Phenylalanine0.0595 ± 0.0006a0.0591 ± 0.0020a0.0490 ± 0.0008b0.0495 ± 0.0007b
Threonine0.0498 ± 0.0011a0.0491 ± 0.0014a0.0392 ± 0.0002c0.0429 ± 0.0005b
Asparagine0.0697 ± 0.0002b0.0757 ± 0.0010a0.0474 ± 0.0010d0.0606 ± 0.0009c
Leucine0.0585 ± 0.0013a0.0557 ± 0.0051a0.0402 ± 0.0024b0.0403 ± 0.0010b
Isoleucine0.0905 ± 0.0012a0.0892 ± 0.0027a0.0827 ± 0.0009b0.0816 ± 0.0007b
Tryptophan0.1283 ± 0.0023a0.1229 ± 0.0004b0.1145 ± 0.0009c0.1142 ± 0.0003c
Methionine0.0746 ± 0.0002a0.0743 ± 0.0000a0.0744 ± 0.0002a0.0742 ± 0.0001a
Valine0.1750 ± 0.0036b0.1920 ± 0.0038a0.0858 ± 0.0017d0.0964 ± 0.0016c
Proline0.1365 ± 0.0031c0.1646 ± 0.0031a0.1556 ± 0.0037ab0.1447 ± 0.0046bc
Tyrosine0.6412 ± 0.0060b0.7754 ± 0.0100a0.3465 ± 0.0013d0.3906 ± 0.0065c
Cysteine0.2575 ± 0.0043b0.2919 ± 0.0021a0.2259 ± 0.0014c0.2265 ± 0.0028c
Alanine0.3480 ± 0.0057a0.3388 ± 0.0011a0.2135 ± 0.0033c0.2280 ± 0.0055b
Glutamate2.8215 ± 0.0595a2.6842 ± 0.0816a1.7033 ± 0.0351c1.9902 ± 0.0404b
Glycine0.1735 ± 0.0004a0.1738 ± 0.0010a0.1683 ± 0.0013b0.1680 ± 0.0005b
Serine0.3748 ± 0.0034b0.4624 ± 0.0076a0.2611 ± 0.0079d0.2861 ± 0.0028c
Aspartate2.1805 ± 0.0091b2.4716 ± 0.0437a1.3313 ± 0.0518c1.4366 ± 0.0061c
Histidine0.1353 ± 0.0025a0.1365 ± 0.0017a0.1054 ± 0.0024c0.1247 ± 0.0017b
Arginine0.2519 ± 0.0056c0.2627 ± 0.0105c0.3347 ± 0.0110b0.5065 ± 0.0160a
Cystine0.2826 ± 0.0006a0.2835 ± 0.0007a0.2840 ± 0.0010a0.2817 ± 0.0002a
Glutamine0.1884 ± 0.0028a0.1843 ± 0.0036ab0.1717 ± 0.0005c0.1795 ± 0.0004b
Total amino acids8.4976 ± 0.0755b8.9478 ± 0.1450a5.8345 ± 0.0963d6.5228 ± 0.2552c
Table 1 Effect of FA on amino acid content (mg g−1 DW) in spinach under nitrate stress. Note: Data represent mean ± standard error (n = 3), and different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Control (CK), 0.15% FA (CF), 150 mM NO3 (N), 0.15% FA + 150 mM NO3 (NF).

The data presented in Fig. 2A illustrate the correlation analysis of the amino acid components with each other. Highly significant positive correlations were observed between threonine and glutamate (r = 1.00), leucine and alanine (r = 1.00), and leucine and isoleucine (r = 0.99). Valine was highly significantly and positively correlated with aspartate (r = 1.00). Tyrosine was highly significantly and positively correlated with aspartate (r = 1.00) and serine (r = 0.99). Cysteine was highly significantly and positively correlated with serine (r = 0.99). Additionally, the total fresh weight was highly significantly and positively correlated with the total amino acid content (r = 1.00). Total dry weight was highly significantly and positively correlated with asparagine (r = 0.99). This indicates that amino acid accumulation and fresh weight may promote each other during spinach growth and that asparagine may be crucial for spinach dry matter accumulation.

41598 2025 93974 Fig2 HTML
Fig. 2 Pearson’s correlation, principal component, and cluster analyses of amino acids in spinach after FA treatment under nitrate stress. Data is expressed as an average (n = 3). * and ** showed significant correlation at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01. Control (CK), 0.15% FA (CF), 150 mM NO3 (N), 0.15% FA + 150 mM NO3 (NF). (A) Pearson’s correlation analysis. (B) Principal component analysis. (C) Cluster analysis; the scale represents different intervals of the data.

Classification of the amino acid content of spinach under nitrate stress was based on principal component analysis (Fig. 2B). Four treatments with 21 amino acid parameters and two biomass parameters formed the corresponding taxa. Two principal components were selected from the 23 indices, with the first and second components accounting for 74.6% and 9.3% (83.9%) of the total variance, respectively. In addition, the loading plot shows that total fresh weight, total dry weight, valine, phenylalanine, alanine, asparagine, and leucine had strong first PC loadings. This indicates that the increase in fresh and dry weights varies synergistically with the accumulation of these amino acids during spinach growth. Proline and cysteine had strong secondary principal component loadings. Arginine loaded negatively on PC1 and PC2. Methionine was negatively loaded onto PC2. The CK, CF, N, and NF treatments produced a clear separation on PC1. The classification model based on cluster analysis was used to divide the four treatments into two primary categories: the CK and CF treatments and the N and NF treatments (Fig. 2C).

Effect of fulvic acid on phenolic acid content in spinach under nitrate stress

FA affected the phenolic acid content of spinach leaves under nitrate stress (Fig. 3). Compared with the CK, the N treatment significantly reduced protocatechuic acid (55.93%), p-hydroxybenzoic acid (55.15%), 4-coumaric acid (45.12%), benzoic acid (27.31%), caffeic acid (47.01%), and cynarin (30.49%) content, and gallic, ferulic, gentisic, and sinapic acid contents were significantly increased by 122.86%, 75.17%, 61.59% and 188.01%, respectively. Compared with the N treatment, the NF treatment significantly increased the protocatechuic acid (42.76%), p-hydroxybenzoic acid (82.71%), 4-coumaric acid (43.89%), benzoic acid (155.87%), and cynarin (40.18%) contents; caffeic and sinapic acid contents were significantly reduced by 46.44% and 15.03%, respectively. Compared with CK, CF treatment significantly increased protocatechuic acid (10.76%), p-hydroxybenzoic acid (34.18%), chlorogenic acid (20.99%), gallic acid (211.93%), 4-coumaric acid (42.99%), ferulic acid (199.54%), cinnamic acid (18.40%), benzoic acid (48.65%), gentisic acid (221.24%), and cynarin (36.90%) content.

41598 2025 93974 Fig3 HTML
Fig. 3 Effect of FA on phenolic acid content in spinach under nitrate stress. Data are expressed as an average (n = 3). Mean values of different letters indicate significant differences using Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Control (CK), 0.15% FA (CF), 150 mM NO3 (N), 0.15% FA + 150 mM NO3 (NF). (A) Protocatechuic acid. (B) p-hydroxybenzoic acid. (C) Chlorogenic acid. (D) Gallic acid. (E) 4-coumaric acid. (F) Ferulic acid. (G) Cinnamic acid. (H) Benzoic acid. (I) Gentisic acid. (J) Caffeic acid. (K) Cynarin. (L) Sinapic acid.

The data presented in Fig. 4A illustrate the correlation analysis of the phenolic acid components with each other. Protocatechuic acid showed a significant positive correlation with p-hydroxybenzoic acid (r = 0.95) and a significant negative correlation with sinapic acid (r = -0.97). p-hydroxybenzoic acid showed a significant positive correlation with cynarin (r = 0.98) and 4-coumaric acid (r = 0.98). Highly significant positive correlations were found between chlorogenic and gentisic acids (r = 1.00), chlorogenic and ferulic acids (r = 1.00), and ferulic and gentisic acids (r = 1.00). Furthermore, 4-coumaric acid showed a significant positive correlation with cynarin (r = 0.98). Additionally, total fresh and dry weights were highly significantly and positively correlated with protocatechuic acid (r = 1.00, r = 0.99). Total fresh and dry weights were significantly negatively correlated with sinapic acid content (r = -0.98, r = -0.95). This indicates that the synthesis of protocatechuic acid was promoted along with biomass accumulation during spinach growth, whereas there was an antagonistic relationship between biomass and sinapic acid accumulation, possibly because the synthesis of other components is prioritized during metabolic processes, causing a reduction in the accumulation of sinapic acid.

41598 2025 93974 Fig4 HTML
Fig. 4 Pearson’s correlation, principal component, and cluster analyses of phenolic acids in spinach after FA treatment under nitrate stress. Data is expressed as an average (n = 3). * and ** showed significant correlation at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01. Control (CK), 0.15% FA (CF), 150 mM NO3 (N), 0.15% FA + 150 mM NO3 (NF). (A) Pearson’s correlation analysis. (B) Principal component analysis. (C) Cluster analysis; the scale represents different intervals of the data.

The principal component analysis of the influence of FA on phenolic acid content in spinach under nitrate stress is shown in Fig. 4B. Four treatments with 12 phenolic acid components and two biomass parameters formed the corresponding taxonomic groups. Two principal components were selected from the 14 indicators, with the first and second components accounting for 52.9% and 37.7% (90.6%) of the total variance, respectively. In addition, the loading diagram shows that benzoic acid, gallic acid, ferulic acid, gentisic scid and chlorogenic acid had strong secondary principal component loadings. Total fresh weight, total dry weight, protocatechuic acid, 4-coumaric acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and cynarin had strong first principal component loadings. Sinapic acid had a negative loading on PC1. The CK, CF, N, and NF treatments were significantly separated on PC1. The classification model based on cluster analysis was used to divide the four treatments into two primary categories: the CK and CF treatments and the N and NF treatments (Fig. 4C).

Effect of fulvic acid on organic acid content in spinach under nitrate stress

FA affected the organic acid content of spinach under nitrate stress (Fig. 5). Compared with CK, N treatment significantly increased oxalic, tartaric, and malic acid contents by 72.06%, 155.40%, and 159.18%, respectively; ascorbic acid content was significantly decreased by 17.25%. Compared with the N treatment, the NF treatment significantly increased tartaric, malic, citric, and ascorbic acid contents by 46.76%, 26.21%, 22.18%, and 18.83%, respectively, and oxalic acid content was significantly reduced by 20.80%. Compared with CK, CF treatment significantly increased tartaric and malic acid contents by 78.42% and 76.97%; oxalic acid content was significantly reduced by 22.61%.

41598 2025 93974 Fig5 HTML
Fig. 5 Effect of FA on organic acid content in spinach under nitrate stress. Data are expressed as an average (n = 3). Mean values of different letters indicate significant differences using Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Control (CK), 0.15% FA (CF), 150 mM NO3 (N), 0.15% FA + 150 mM NO3 (NF). (A) Oxalic acid. (B) Tartaric acid. (C) Malic acid. (D) Citric acid. (E) Ascorbic acid.

The data presented in Fig. 6A illustrate the correlation analysis of the organic acid components with each other. Tartaric acid significantly and positively correlated with malic acid (r = 0.99). The other organic acid components were not significantly correlated. Additionally, total fresh weight showed a significant negative correlation with oxalic acid (r = -0.99). Total dry weight was highly significantly and negatively correlated with oxalic acid (r = -1.00). This indicates that oxalic acid content and spinach biomass accumulation may be regulated by different physiological mechanisms and that these mechanisms tend to exhibit a trade-off relationship between the two under different treatment conditions.

41598 2025 93974 Fig6 HTML
Fig. 6 Pearson’s correlation, principal component, and cluster analyses of organic acids in spinach after FA treatment under nitrate stress. Data are expressed as average values (n = 3). The data is expressed as an average (n = 3). * showed significant correlation at p < 0.05. Control (CK), 0.15% FA (CF), 150 mM NO3 (N), 0.15% FA + 150 mM NO3 (NF). (A) Pearson’s correlation analysis. (B) Principal component analysis. (C) Cluster analysis; the scale represents different intervals of the data.

The principal component analysis of the effect of FA on organic acid content in spinach under nitrate stress is shown in Fig. 6B. Four treatments with 5 organic acid components and two biomass parameters formed the corresponding taxonomic groups. Two principal components were selected from the7 indicators, with the first and second components accounting for 61.8% and 26.2% (88.0%) of the total variance, respectively. In addition, the loading plots showed that ascorbic acid and citric acid had strong secondary principal component loadings. Tartaric acid and malic acid had strong first principal component loadings. Oxalic acid had a negative loading on PC2. Total fresh and dry weights had positive loadings on PC2. The CF treatment did not cause a clear separation from the CK treatment. In contrast, the CK and CF treatments were clearly separated from the N and NF treatments on PC1. A classification model based on cluster analysis was used to divide the four treatments into two primary categories: the CK and CF treatments, and the N and NF treatments (Fig. 6C).

Effect of fulvic acid on mineral element contents in spinach under nitrate stress

The effect of FA on the mineral element content of spinach under nitrate stress is shown in Fig. 7. Compared with the CK, the N treatment significantly increased nitrogen (150.00%), kalium (24.13%), calcium (9.16%), and manganese (12.58%) contents, and phosphorus (12.18%), magnesium (30.15%), natrium (6.36%), ferrum (25.89%), and zinc (12.83%) contents were significantly decreased. Compared with the N treatment, the NF treatment significantly increased phosphorus (9.36%), natrium (1.26%), ferrum (24.60%), and zinc (12.62%) contents and significantly decreased nitrogen (16.95%), kalium (11.74%), calcium (10.96%), and magnesium (14.02%) contents. Compared with CK, the CF treatment significantly increased the phosphorus content by 8.36% and significantly decreased the magnesium content by 9.33%.

41598 2025 93974 Fig7 HTML
Fig. 7 Effect of FA on the mineral element contents in spinach under nitrate stress. Data are expressed as an average (n = 3). Mean values of different letters indicate significant differences using Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Control (CK), 0.15% FA (CF), 150 mM NO3 (N), 0.15% FA + 150 mM NO3 (NF). (A) Nitrogen. (B) Phosphorus. (C) Kalium. (D) Calcium. (E) Magnesium. (F) Natrium. (G) Ferrum. (H) Manganese. (I) Cuprum. (J) Zinc.

The data presented in Fig. 8A illustrate the correlation analysis of the mineral elements with each other. Na was significantly negatively correlated with N (r = -0.98) and K (r = -0.98). Zn was significantly negatively correlated with Ca (r = -0.99). Mg was highly significantly negatively correlated with Mn (r = -1.00). Additionally, total fresh and dry weights showed a highly significant positive correlation with Na (r = 0.99, r = 0.99). Total fresh and dry weights were significantly negatively correlated with K (r = -0.95, r = -0.96). Total fresh weight was significantly negatively correlated with N (r = -0.97).

41598 2025 93974 Fig8 HTML
Fig. 8 Pearson’s correlation, principal component, and cluster analyses of mineral elements in spinach after FA treatment under nitrate stress. Data is expressed as an average (n = 3). * and ** showed significant correlation at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01. Control (CK), 0.15% FA (CF), 150 mM NO3 (N), 0.15% FA + 150 mM NO3 (NF). (A) Pearson’s correlation analysis. (B) Principal component analysis. (C) Cluster analysis; the scale represents different intervals of the data.

The principal component analysis of the effect of FA on the mineral element contents in spinach under nitrate stress is shown in Fig. 8B. Four treatments with 10 mineral elements and two biomass parameters formed the corresponding taxonomic groups. Two principal components were selected from the 12 indicators, with the first and second components accounting for 64.3% and 16.0% (80.3%) of the total variance, respectively. In addition, the loading plots indicated strong first principal component loadings for total fresh weight, total dry weight, Na, P, and Fe, and strong negative first principal component loadings for K and N. This indicates that Na, P, and Fe play a positive role in promoting plant growth and increasing biomass during spinach growth. There may be an antagonistic relationship between the mechanisms of N and K absorption or utilization and the mechanism of spinach biomass increase. Mg had positive loadings in PC1 and PC2. Mn showed negative loadings on PC1 and PC2. The CF treatment did not produce a significant separation from the CK treatment. In contrast, the N and NF treatments were significantly separated in PC2. A classification model based on cluster analysis was used to divide the four treatments into two primary categories: the CK and CF treatments, and the N and NF treatments (Fig. 8C).

Discussion

Therefore, amino acids are crucial indicators of the nutritional quality of vegetables. In addition, amino acids participate in plant responses to stress via osmotic regulation. It has been shown that NaCl stress reduces the amino acid content of spinach and negatively affects its nutritional quality. Similar results were obtained in this study. In the present study, the application of FA application under nitrate stress increased the total amino acid content and promoted primary metabolism, which improved spinach’s nutritional value. Similarly, nitrate stress significantly increased proline and arginine content, which may be because of their roles as osmoregulators in maintaining osmotic balance under abiotic stresses, increasing plant resilience (Table 1). Arginine content also increased significantly after FA application. In our study, nitrate stress significantly reduced alanine and glutamate contents, which are associated with umami, and their contents were significantly increased after FA application, suggesting that stress reduced the freshness of spinach while FA enriched its umami. This might be because FA significantly increases relevant amino acid content by promoting relevant metabolic pathways or regulating physiological processes, which enriches the fresh flavor of spinach. Under cadmium stress, FA increased the amino acid content and played a central role in scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS), reducing intracellular oxidative damage. This finding is consistent with the results of this study. Oxidative stress impairs the mitochondrial oxidative defense system, causing the disruption of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and affecting amino acid metabolism, resulting in energy deficiency. Changes in amino acid abundance affect plant adaptations to NaCl stress. In this study, FA promoted tyrosine accumulation under nitrate stress, reducing oxidative damage. FA may activate metabolic pathways associated with tyrosine synthesis, prompting the conversion of more precursors to tyrosine, and the accumulated tyrosine may be directly involved in scavenging reactive oxygen radicals as an antioxidant. Effective measures should be taken to mitigate the harmful effects of nitrate stress on spinach metabolism; for example, increasing the intermediate and amino acid contents of the TCA cycle can maintain the normal metabolic process under stress. In this study, FA increased threonine, asparagine, valine, tyrosine, alanine, glutamate, serine, histidine, cystine, and glutamine contents under nitrate stress. The decrease in aspartic and glutamic acid contents under nitrate stress may be owing to their rapid conversion to useful products or their binding to proteins to resist adversity. Furthermore, glutamate is crucial in amino acid metabolism and is a precursor of other amino acids; changes in its content can affect the abundance of downstream amino acids. NaCl stress reduced the abundance of various amino acids (e.g., glycine and serine). Moreover, studies have also shown that the accumulation of aspartic acid and arginine can reduce oxidative damage to maintain the osmotic pressure difference between cells under abiotic stress. In this study, FA application also promoted the accumulation of the above two amino acids under nitrate stress. This suggests that FA might also improve the nutritional quality of spinach by promoting antioxidant metabolism and accelerating the accumulation of primary metabolites. This study primarily shows that FA could increase the total amino acid content of spinach under nitrate stress, promote primary metabolism, and improve the nutritional value of spinach, and revealed the role of amino acids in plant response to stress as osmotic regulating factors in maintaining osmotic balance, and in resistance to adversity.

Organic acids are organic compounds containing carboxyl groups and are found in living organisms. They are acidic components of fruits and vegetables that can directly affect their taste, flavor, and nutritional quality. Organic acids participate in photosynthesis, respiration, and the metabolism of vegetables and the synthesis of phenols, amino acids, esters, and aromatic substances. They soften blood vessels, regulate intestinal function, promote trace element absorption, and promote the TCA cycle, which has anti-fatigue effects. Some organic acids also enhance plant tolerance to biotic and abiotic stressors through osmoregulation and potent antioxidant capacity. Therefore, studying the organic acid content of spinach under abiotic stress to understand its nutritional value is crucial. In this study, nitrate stress increased oxalic, tartaric, and malic acid contents. This may be because organic acids are involved in several underlying mechanisms, such as scavenging free radicals to protect cells from ROS-related damage, maintaining normal cellular activity. FA increased tartaric, malic, and citric acid contents under nitrate stress, providing sufficient substrates for the TCA cycle and amino acid biosynthesis and ensuring the normal production of energy and amino acids. FA application significantly increased the ascorbic acid content. This might be because FA has antioxidant properties that activate the plant antioxidant system to reduce the oxidative depletion of ascorbic acid and promote its regeneration. Similarly, FA might regulate gene expression to increase the transcription level of genes related to ascorbic acid synthesis, increasing its content. Thus, FA alleviates the inhibition of nitrate stress to some extent and promotes nutrient accumulation in spinach.

Mineral nutrients are essential for plant growth and development and play various physiological functions in plants, such as participating in the composition of the cell structure, regulating enzyme activity, maintaining electrochemical balance, influencing photosynthesis and energy metabolism, and synthesizing hormones. Among them, cuprum, zinc, and other mineral elements are vital components of many enzymes in the human body that can promote metabolic processes and maintain normal physiological functions of the human body. Ferrum is an essential component of hemoglobin that promotes the transportation and utilization of oxygen and maintains normal respiration and energy metabolism in the human body. Mineral elements, such as sodium, potassium, and magnesium, maintain nerve and muscle functions and keep the body moving and feeling properly. Additionally, biotic and abiotic stressors can affect the pathways of mineral element uptake by the plant root system, affecting plant growth, development, and nutrient accumulation. In this study, nitrate stress increased N, K, and Ca contents in spinach. This might have been caused by the application of excess potassium and calcium nitrates in the nutrient solution; however, FA application inhibited the enhancement of their content. Nitrate stress reduces phosphorus and magnesium levels. This is consistent with the findings of this study. The results showed that nitrate stress reduced the phosphorus, magnesium, natrium, ferrum, and zinc contents. This may be caused by various factors; for example, root cells are subjected to osmotic stress, ionic toxicity, and oxidative stress hazards in high salt concentration environments, which can cause a deficiency of mineral elements in the crop. Moreover, excessive accumulation of oxalic acid in plants can also affect their mineral nutrient uptake, causing severe nutrient stress, which is consistent with the results of a previous study. However, FA application usually has the opposite effect, with only a further decrease in magnesium concentration and a significant increase in the contents of other elements. This indicates that FA can regulate the mineral element composition under nitrate stress. FA possibly enhances mineral element uptake by improving the environment of the plant root system; similarly, it might regulate the expression of genes related to the transport of mineral elements and optimize the distribution of mineral elements in plants. Therefore, FA regulates the composition of mineral elements under adverse conditions, which is essential for plant growth and for improving the yield and quality of crops. A limitation of this study might be that the environmental conditions are relatively singular, which is different from the actual complex environment in the field and can only provide a theoretical basis for actual production and planting. Thus, the results of this study should be applied to field trials in future studies to explore the challenges in actual production, optimize the experimental operation and planting mode, and conduct a more in-depth investigation of the molecular mechanisms and signal transduction pathways to provide a theoretical basis for regulation.

Conclusion

This study provides insights into the reactions of metabolic products and changes in the mineral element content of spinach upon FA application under nitrate stress. We found that FA promoted the accumulation of nutrients such as amino acids, phenolic acids, organic acids, and mineral elements under nitrate stress, reducing the adverse effects of stress on spinach plants. Therefore, growers can improve the nutritional quality and value of spinach through FA application under nitrate stress conditions. This study supports a new strategy for effectively mitigating adverse stressors and improving the nutritional quality of crops under nitrate stress.

Dora Fulvic HQ is a water-soluble yellow-brown 90% fulvic acid powder with OMRI Listed. It has an amazing nutrient carrying capacity. It can be added to any initial fertilizer or foliar application because it will significantly increase the effective absorption of nutrients in the field.

In the soil, fulvic acid soluble powder provides a rich carbon source to stimulate microbial activity and improve root efficiency. It is a natural chelating agent that combines with the nutrients in the soil. Plant roots absorb these fulvic acid nutrient compounds, which effectively improves the efficiency of plant absorption of nutrients and reduces the loss of nutrients in the soil.

Fulvic Acid (OMRI Listed)

Dora Agri supplies Organic Fulvic Acid 90% Powder, it’s 100% water soluble and OMRI Listed. Especially for sustainable agriculture.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top
WhatsApp Us